Proving seamless data workflows is essential for delivering reliable and timely insights in data engineering. At DataEngi, we constantly aim to use the most advanced tools to improve data orchestration processes.
Despite the availability of alternatives, Apache Airflow is still the most sought-after orchestrator for ETL processes and data processing pipelines. Still, some of its shortcomings and limitations prevent it from covering all the needs of the modern data engineer. An alternative to Airflow is the new product Dagster. This framework offers unique features that take our data pipelines to new heights. In this article, we'll take an in-depth look at the features and benefits of Dagster, explain why we choose it as a data orchestration tool, and how it can transform your data engineering projects.
What is Dagster used for?
So, what is the tool Dagster? Dagster is an open-source, next-generation data orchestration platform for real-time data asset development, production, and monitoring. Its primary goal is to provide engineers, data scientists, and developers with a unified experience in managing the entire lifecycle of data assets, from development and testing to production and monitoring. With Dagster, users can manage their data assets with code and track the “runs” of all jobs in one place with a run timeline view. The run detail view allows users to zoom in on runs and precisely identify issues.
Dagster open source allows users to see the context of each asset and update it in one place, including materializations, rulers, schema, schedule, sections, and more. It can also run and track backfills for each section of data. Dagster is an enterprise-grade orchestration platform that prioritizes developer experience (DX) with fully serverless hybrid deployments, native branching, and out-of-the-box CI/CD configuration.
Which is better: Dagster or Airflow?
Orchestration platforms like Dagster and Airflow are important for automating and optimizing data processes. Apache Airflow and Dagster are open-source tools that manage and schedule data workflows. Although they share similar objectives, their methods and features vary. Comparing the capabilities of these two platforms is essential for data engineers to select the most suitable framework for their specific requirements.
Apache Airflow Advantages:
Mature and Established: Airflow has been around longer and has a robust, mature ecosystem.
Flexibility: It allows for dynamic pipeline generation, which is helpful for complex workflows. This framework is written in Python, making it accessible and flexible for Python developers.
Extensive Integrations: Airflow has various pre-built integrations with multiple services and tools.
User Interface: It also provides a user-friendly web interface for monitoring and managing workflows.
Apache Airflow Disadvantages:
Complexity: Airflow can be complex to set up and manage, particularly for beginners. It also requires more infrastructure management, which can be resource-intensive.
Task Dependency Management: The Airflow tool requires manual setup of task dependencies, which can become cumbersome in large pipelines.
Scalability: Users may face performance issues with extensive workflows or a high number of tasks.
Dagster Advantages and Disadvantages:
What are the pros and cons of Dagster? Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of using Dagster to understand better how it can fit into your data engineering workflows and whether it aligns with your team's needs and capabilities.
So, the Dagster pros are:
Modern Design: This is a modular approach with reusable components (solids) that can be combined into pipelines. Dagster enforces strong typing, ensuring data integrity and reducing errors.
Dynamic Execution Plans: Pipelines can adapt their execution paths based on runtime conditions, enhancing flexibility.
Improved Monitoring and Logging: Dagster tool provides robust tools for monitoring and logging pipeline runs, enabling better visibility and troubleshooting.
Developer-Friendly: Clean API and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to work with.
Integration Capabilities: It integrates well with various data storage, processing, and visualization tools such as Apache Spark, Pandas, and Jupyter Notebooks.
Dagster Cons:
Complex Learning: The modular architecture and strong typing can introduce a steeper learning curve for teams with more straightforward orchestration tools.
Evolving Tool: Dagster is a relatively newer tool than Airflow, so some features and integrations might still need to be developed or more mature.
Limited Plugins: While Dagster supports many integrations, its ecosystem is not as extensive as Airflow’s, which has a vast array of plugins for various services.
To summarize, Apache Airflow is a well-established, flexible, and widely used tool with a large community and extensive integrations. However, it can be complex and requires significant infrastructure management. Dagster is a modern orchestration tool that emphasizes modularity, strong typing and dynamic execution plans, and advanced monitoring and logging capabilities. However, it is newer, with a smaller community and fewer plugins.
The choice between Dagster and Airflow depends on your use case, team experience, and project requirements. Airflow may be a better choice if you need a mature, widely distributed solution with extensive integrations. If you prioritize modern design, strong typing, and advanced monitoring capabilities, Dagster may be a better choice.
Comments